A co-owner can technically rent a jointly owned property on an Airbnb or another short-term rental platform without the other co-owner’s permission. However, in a partition action, the court can force the renting co-owner to account for the income, pay for any exclusive use, and ultimately end the co-ownership. California treats co-owners as having an … Read More
When a co-owner refuses to pay their share of homeowner’s insurance premiums, a partition action gives the paying co-owner the legal power to end the co-ownership and recover what they’ve been forced to overpay. Co-owners, most commonly tenants in common, share responsibility for property expenses proportionate to their ownership interest. Homeowner’s insurance is not optional: … Read More
When one co-owner wants to live in a property and the other does not, a partition action is the ultimate legal solution to resolve disputes over possession, expenses, and fairness. In California, uncooperative co-owners generally have equal rights to occupy the entire property, but that doesn’t mean one can live there without consequences. Equal Right … Read More
Yes. In California, you can file a partition action to force the sale of jointly owned investment property, even if the other co-owner does not agree. When co-owners of an investment property disagree on whether to sell, refinance, or manage the property, the situation can quickly become frustrating and financially draining. Fortunately, California law provides … Read More
Los Angeles’ controversial “mansion tax,” officially known as Measure ULA, has created substantial confusion for co-owners, buyers of a fractional interest, investors, and parties involved in partition actions. One recurring question is whether the tax applies when only a fractional interest in real property is transferred rather than the entire property. The answer is: generally, … Read More
A co-owner who abandons a property in California does not lose their ownership rights, but their absence often creates financial strain that can be resolved through a partition action. When one co-owner stops contributing, the remaining co-owner is often left covering the mortgage and upkeep alone. This situation is common among unmarried couples, family members, … Read More
Among the more creative arguments in partition action cases is the idea that one co-owner should pay the capital gains taxes of the other co-owner. When co-owned property is sold, especially in a partition action, disputes often arise over who gets what, known as a partition accounting. Usually, these claims about accounting relate to unequal … Read More
Owning real estate in California can create significant financial opportunity — and significant tax complexity. Whether the property is a residence, rental, inherited asset, or co-owned investment, multiple layers of taxes may apply at different stages of co-ownership. For co-owners in particular, taxes often become critically important when a dispute arises, a buyout is negotiated, … Read More
Mental illness can create challenges, with property co-ownership being particularly challenging under California law. From refusal to sell to unpaid expenses, behavioral health concerns can complicate co-ownership and often lead to property disputes. Conditions like anxiety, depression, or substance use disorders may cause communication breakdowns, financial mismanagement, or outright refusal to cooperate. These issues often … Read More
When you own real estate with another person, disagreements about improvements are common, especially when one co-owner wants to upgrade the property and the other refuses to pay or participate. California co-ownership laws give each owner rights to use and possess the property, but those same laws create complexity about what occurs when one co-owner … Read More
Free Consultation
For select matters, payment can be deferred until resolution, with monthly billing also available.
California's most experienced partition attorneys.
Recognition
As Featured In
From Our Blog
Statewide Coverage
The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.
