Who Pays for a Partition Action?

California law allows the party filing a partition action to request that the court award their attorney’s fees and costs from the other co-owners. Attorneys fees are most likely to be granted against an uncooperative defendant. These fees are generally paid from the proceeds of sale of the property. 

In fact, the recovery is not limited only to attorney’s fees, but also includes filing and court fees, fees associated with fixing up the property in preparation for sale, referee fees, and broker/Realtor commissions.

What is the rule on who pays for a partition action?

The rule on who pays for a partition action is that “the court shall apportion the costs of partition among the parties in proportion to their interests or make such other apportionment as may be equitable.” Code of Civil Procedure 874.040. In turn, the “costs of partition include…reasonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.” Code of Civil Procedure 874.010(a).

“Section 874.040 has been consistently interpreted as giving courts only two options in apportioning the costs and fees of a partition action. The court may apportion the fees and costs based on the parties’ respective interests in the property, or it may apportion the costs and fees based on some other equitable apportionment.” Finney v. Gomez (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 527, 545.

General Rule is that Costs of Partition are Allocated According to Ownership Interest

Generally, “the court shall apportion” attorney’s fees and other costs of partition “in proportion to their interests….” Code of Civil Procedure 874.040; see Code of Civil Procedure 874.010(a). This means that a 50/50 owner would normally be able to recover 50% of the costs of the partition, which include attorney’s fees.

However, the Court Can Allocate the Costs of a Partition Entirely to One Party

“Sections 874.010 and 874.040 provide numerous avenues for trial courts to adjust the allocation of costs [of partition].” Orien v. Lutz (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 957, 968.

The law also allows the court to “make such other apportionment [of the costs of partition] as may be equitable.” Code of Civil Procedure 874.040. “The Law Revision Commission comments to section 874.040 offer the only guidance as to what constitutes ‘other apportionment[s] as may be equitable.’ The Comment states: ‘Although normally the costs of partition are apportioned in proportion to the interests of the parties, there may be cases in which some other arrangement will be equitable. Where litigation for the common benefit arises among only some of the parties, or where the interest of the parties in all items, lots, or parcels of property are not identical, the court may segregate the costs of partition to the extent practicable and apportion a part among particular parties only.'” Finney v. Gomez (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 527, 545–546.

Moreover, even when costs of partition are requested, the fees must be “for the common benefit.” Code Civ. Proc. § 874.010(a).

Most Cases Settle With Each Side Paying their Own Costs of Partition

Attorneys might give you the false hope that your partition will be free by citing the laws on reallocation of attorney’s fees in a partition. The problem is that this reallocation only occurs in a small number of heavily litigated cases.

What many attorneys won’t tell you, perhaps because they are unaware, is that most partitions end in a settlement. Those settlements either involve one party, usually the defendant, buying out the other party’s interest in the property, or the property being listed for sale.

Parties are generally hesitant to pay the legal fees of the other side in a settlement, seeing this as an admission of wrongdoing. Rather, most settlements will involve each side paying their own costs of the partition.

Accordingly, parties should prepare for this likely result by keeping their costs of partition as low as may be appropriate under the circumstances. This means selecting an attorney who will efficiently litigate your partition action.

Takeaway: Keep the Costs of Partition Low to Ensure You Win the Partition

There’s nothing worse than a hollow victory where one party is declared the winner, but their legal fees take away the benefit. At Talkov Law, we focus on developing efficient solutions to partition actions. To that end, we have developed strategies and tactics that will help to reduce the attorney’s fees and costs of a partition action.

Since many partitions result in a settlement, and most settlements involve a walk-away on the cost of a partition whereby each side pays their own fees and costs, it is important to select an attorney who handles only partition law to make your net recovery from the sale of the property as high as possible.

Talkov Law's Partition Attorneys Can Help

If you want to end your co-ownership relationship, but your co-owner won’t agree, a partition action is your only option. With seven, full time partition lawyers, Talkov Law is the #1 partition law firm in California and has handled over 300 partition actions throughout California. Every case has resulted in a sale to either a third party or one of the co-owners. Not a single court has denied our clients the right to partition or declared our client to be a non-owner. Plus, for qualified cases, there is no fee until we settle or win your case!

If you're looking to end your co-ownership dispute, contact California's premier partition action law firm by calling Talkov Law at (844) 4-TALKOV (825568) or sending us a message today.

Avatar photo
About Talkov Law Partition Attorneys

The partition attorneys at Talkov Law end co-ownership disputes by representing co-owners in real estate partition actions throughout the State of California.

Talkov Law is Rated 5 out of 5 stars based on 38 customer reviews.

Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation & Pay No Retainer

Call Talkov Law to discuss having your legal fees paid from the proceeds of sale of your property and no money down







      Awards and Recognition

      US News and World Report Scott Talkov

      We Have Been Featured On:

      The Real Deal

      The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.