Right of First Refusal in a California Partition Action

What is a Right of First Refusal in a Partition Action?

In a California partition action, a right of first refusal is a right given to co-owners that allows them to purchase their other co-owners’ interests before the property is sold to a third party. This gives all co-owners a chance the resolve the co-ownership dispute before it escalates to a sale on the open market.

Right of First Refusal in the Partition of Real Property Act

The Partition of Real Property Act is a bill that went into effect January 1, 2023 that allows non-partitioning parties of “real property held in tenancy in common where there is no agreement in a record binding all the cotenants which governs the partition of the property” to buy out their co-owners’ interests. [1] California Code of Civil Procedure 874.317 further describes the added opportunities and time frame available to the non-partitioning parties should they choose to buy out the partitioning parties’ interests. Essentially, the Partition of Real Property Act creates a right of first refusal for non-partitioning parties that was not previously available to them. Note that the Partition of Real Property Act will not apply to all partition actions. However, parties who did not request a sale in partition actions in which it does apply are statutorily given the opportunity of right of first refusal.

Does the Right of First Refusal Create a Waiver to the Right to Partition in California?

California Code of Civil Procedure 872.710(b) states that “partition…shall be as of right unless barred by a valid waiver.” California courts have also long established that: “A co-owner of property has an absolute right to partition unless barred by a valid waiver.” [2]Orien v. Lutz (2017) 16 Cal. App. 5th 957.[/fn] Indeed, the absolute right to partition is one of the key partition rights for owners of jointly owned property.

One of the few defenses to this absolute right is waiver to the right to partition. In many cases, the right of first refusal may be construed as an implied waiver to the right to partition. Indeed, “one party will not sell his one-half interest in the property without first giving to the other coowner the right to purchase it…” [3] Another court found that “the right of first refusal waived the statutory right to partition…” [4]LEG Investments v. Boxler (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 484, 492. This same court also made it clear that it “follow[s] Schwartz and find[s] the right of first refusal modifie[s] the statutory right to partition and require[s] the selling cotenant to first comply with the terms of … [the] agreement before seeking partition.” [5]

What if a Co-Owner Declines their Right of First Refusal in a Partition Action?

When a non-partitioning co-owner can’t or won’t buy out their co-owners, their right of first refusal will expire. Indeed, the Court of Appeal established that: “Upon the nonselling owner’s refusal or failure to exercise his right to purchase within a reasonable time, the seller has discharged his obligation to his coowner and he may proceed with partition.” [6]

Talkov Law's Partition Attorneys Can Help

If you want to end your co-ownership relationship, but your co-owner won’t agree, a partition action is your only option. With twelve, full time partition lawyers, Talkov Law is the #1 partition law firm in California and has handled over 600 partition actions throughout California. Every case has resulted in a sale to either a third party or one of the co-owners. Not a single court has denied our clients the right to partition or declared our client to be a non-owner. Plus, for qualified cases, there is no fee until we settle or win your case!

If you're looking to end your co-ownership dispute, contact California's premier partition action law firm by calling Talkov Law at (877) PARTITION (727-8484) or sending us a message today.

References

References
1 California Code of Civil Procedure 874.311
2 Orien v. Lutz (2017) 16 Cal. App. 5th 957
3 Schwartz v. Shapiro (1964) 229 Cal.App.2d 238, 252.
4 LEG Investments v. Boxler (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 484, 492.
5 LEG Investments v. Boxler (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 484, 497.
6 Schwartz v. Shapiro (1964) 229 Cal.App.2d 238, 253.
About Scott Talkov

Scott Talkov is California's #1 partition lawyer, having handled over 600 partition actions. He founded Talkov Law Corp. after more than one decade of experience at a California real estate litigation firm, where he served as one of the firm's partners. He has been featured on CNN, ABC 7, KCBS, and KCAL-9, and in the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register, the San Diego Union-Tribune, the Press-Enterprise, and in Los Angeles Lawyer Magazine. Scott has been rated by Super Lawyers since 2013. He can be reached at info@talkovlaw.com or (877) PARTITION (727-8484).

Free Consultation

Speak With a Partition Attorney Today

For select matters, payment can be deferred until resolution, with monthly billing also available.

Why Talkov Law

California's First & Most Experienced Partition Firm

  • 600+ partition cases handled — more than any firm in California
  • Free consultation — speak directly with a partition attorney
  • No fee until you win for qualified cases
  • Statewide coverage across all of California

Recognition

Awards & Recognition

As Featured In

ABOVE THE LAW ABA JOURNAL TODAY LA Times THE REAL DEAL ABC7 REDFIN DAILY JOURNAL

From Our Blog

California's Most Comprehensive Partition Law Resource

  • 500+ articles covering every aspect of partition law
  • Written by practicing partition attorneys
  • Trusted by co-owners, attorneys & real estate professionals
  • Updated regularly with new case law & legal developments

Statewide Coverage

Offices Throughout California

The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.