Wasco Partition Lawyer

Partition Actions in Wasco

Wasco is a city located in Kern County, California. It is situated in the San Joaquin Valley, approximately 8 miles northwest of Bakersfield. Wasco is known for its agricultural production, particularly of almonds, pistachios, and grapes. The city is also home to a variety of businesses, including a large industrial park. Wasco is a popular destination for outdoor recreation, with nearby Lake Isabella offering camping, fishing, and boating opportunities. The city also has several parks, including Wasco City Park and Wasco Memorial Park. Wasco is served by the Wasco Union Elementary School District and the Wasco Union High School District.

According to Zillow, the median home value in Wasco, California is $232,400. As of the 2020 United States Census, the population of Wasco, California was 25,540.

Experienced Real Estate Partition Action Attorneys Serving Wasco

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Kern County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. California partition actions provide a legal mechanism for co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes allow a co-owner to file a lawsuit in court to have the property divided, either physically or by awarding each co-owner a certain percentage of the property’s value. The court will then order the property to be divided according to the co-owners’ wishes. The partition statutes also provide that if the court finds that a physical division of the property is not feasible, it may order the property to be sold and the proceeds divided among the co-owners.

Our team of partition attorneys can assist co-owners with frequently asked questions about partitions, such as:

Speak to Our Wasco Partition Attorneys Today

Call our Kern County Partition Attorneys today to end your co-ownership dispute. You don’t pay until the house is sold!

Call us at (661) 999-3300 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation

    Strangman v. Duke – Partition Action Case Study

    In the legal case of Strangman v. Duke, 140 Cal.App.2d 185 (1956), the issue of partition was at the center of the dispute. The case involved a dispute between two siblings over the partition of a family home. The siblings had inherited the home from their parents, and the plaintiff, Strangman, wanted to partition the home so that each sibling could have their own separate residence. The defendant, Duke, argued that the home should not be partitioned, as it would be too costly and would destroy the value of the home. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Strangman, finding that partition was the only way to fairly divide the property between the siblings. The court also noted that partition would not necessarily destroy the value of the home, as it could be done in a way that would preserve the value of the property.

    Contact our Team of Experienced Partition Lawyers Serving the City of Wasco, County of Kern, California

    Our Wasco partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. Talkov law unlocks access to justice for co-owners by funding your case. For qualified cases, you pay no fees until we successfully partition your property by obtaining a sale on the market or to your co-owner! For a free consultation with California’s first and largest team of partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (661) 999-3300 or contact us online today.

    Talkov Law is Rated 5 out of 5 stars based on 39 customer reviews.

    Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation & Pay No Retainer

    Call Talkov Law to discuss having your legal fees paid from the proceeds of sale of your property and no money down

        Awards and Recognition

        US News and World Report Scott Talkov

        We Have Been Featured On:

        The Real Deal

        The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.