Santa Rosa Partition Lawyer

Partition Actions in Santa Rosa

Santa Rosa is a city in Sonoma County, California, located in the North Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area. It is the county seat of Sonoma County and the fifth-largest city in the Bay Area. Santa Rosa is known for its natural beauty, with rolling hills, vineyards, and redwood forests. The city is home to a vibrant arts and culture scene, with numerous galleries, museums, and performing arts venues. Santa Rosa is also a popular destination for outdoor recreation, with numerous parks, trails, and lakes. The city is also home to a number of wineries and breweries, making it a great destination for wine and beer lovers.

According to Zillow, the median home value in Santa Rosa, California is $637,400 as of 2021. As of 2020, the population of the Santa Rosa, California area is approximately 175,155.

Experienced Real Estate Partition Action Attorneys Serving Santa Rosa

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Sonoma County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. California partition actions provide a legal mechanism for co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes allow a co-owner to file a lawsuit in court to have the property divided, either physically or by sale. The court will then order the division of the property in a way that is fair and equitable to all parties. The partition statutes also provide that any proceeds from the sale of the property must be divided among the co-owners in proportion to their respective interests in the property.

Our team of partition attorneys can assist co-owners with frequently asked questions about partitions, such as:

Speak to Our Santa Rosa Partition Attorneys Today

Call our Sonoma County Partition Attorneys today to end your co-ownership dispute. You don’t pay until the house is sold!

Call us at (707) 777-6600 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation

    Cooley v. Miller & Lux – Partition Action Case Study

    In the legal case of Cooley v. Miller & Lux, 168 Cal. 120 (1914), the issue of partition was at the center of the dispute. The case involved a dispute between two co-owners of a ranch in California. The plaintiff, Cooley, sought to partition the ranch, while the defendant, Miller & Lux, argued that the ranch was not subject to partition because it was held in joint tenancy. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Cooley, finding that the ranch was subject to partition because it was held in tenancy in common, not joint tenancy. The court also held that the partition should be made in accordance with the wishes of the parties, and that the court should not interfere with the partition unless it was necessary to protect the rights of the parties.

    Contact our Team of Experienced Partition Lawyers Serving the City of Santa Rosa in the County of Sonoma, California.

    Our partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. Call the experienced real estate partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (707) 777-6600 or contact us online for a free consultation about your co-ownership issues.

    Our partition attorneys in Santa Rosa also serve Rincon Valley, Fountaingrove, Bennett Valley, Oakmont, Roseland, and Windsor.

    Talkov Law is Rated 5 out of 5 stars based on 53 customer reviews.

    Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation & Pay No Retainer

    Call Talkov Law to discuss having your legal fees paid from the proceeds of sale of your property and no money down

      Awards and Recognition

      US News and World Report Scott Talkov

      We Have Been Featured On:

      The Real Deal

      Recent Blog Posts

      The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.