Napa County Partition Lawyer

Partition Actions in Napa County

Napa County is a county located in the northern part of the U.S. state of California. It is part of the San Francisco Bay Area and is known for its wine production, particularly its Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay. The county seat is the city of Napa. The county has a total area of 828 square miles, of which 804 square miles is land and 24 square miles is water. The population of Napa County was 136,484 as of the 2010 census. The county is home to several state parks, including Bothe-Napa Valley State Park, Robert Louis Stevenson State Park, and Bale Grist Mill State Historic Park. It is also home to several wineries, including Robert Mondavi Winery, Beringer Vineyards, and Stags’ Leap Winery.

According to Zillow, the median home value in Napa County, California is $717,400 as of 2021. As of July 1, 2019, the population of Napa County, California was estimated to be 139,817.

Experienced Real Estate Partition Action Attorneys Serving Napa County

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Napa County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. A California partition action is a law that allows co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes provide a legal mechanism for co-owners to divide the property without having to go through the court system. The partition statutes allow co-owners to divide the property either by agreement or by court order. If the co-owners cannot agree on how to divide the property, then the court will divide the property in a way that is fair and equitable to all parties. The partition statutes also provide that any partition of the property must be in accordance with the laws of the state of California. The legal effect of the partition statutes is that it provides a legal mechanism for co-owners to divide their property without having to go through the court system.

Our team of partition attorneys can assist co-owners with frequently asked questions about partitions, such as:

  • Who pays for a partition action? In California, each party typically pays for their own attorney’s fees (known as the “American Rule”). However, California partition law allows for an exception to this rule, stating that “the court shall apportion the costs of partition among the parties in proportion to their interests or make such other apportionment as may be equitable.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.040. Indeed, the court may award “reasonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.010(a).
  • How to force the sale of jointly owned property? A partition action is the only statutory method to ensure the end of the co-ownership dispute.
  • Will there be a trial in a California partition action? Trials are extremely rare in partition actions because the interlocutory judgment procedure allows for a partition referee to be appointed by meeting just a few elements that rarely involve live testimony from witnesses. Even if a trial occurred, it would almost certainly relate only to the ownership interests or the distribution of proceeds, though most cases are decided on motion heard by the court based on the papers submitted by the parties.
  • Can we negotiate a settlement instead of going through a partition action? We find that the best solution is to file the partition action, then negotiate a settlement. Defendants often reach a more reasonable settlement when they are being advised by a partition attorney who will explain that the plaintiff is very likely to obtain the sale of the property.
  • In a partition action, can I be reimbursed for paying more than my fair share of the down payment? Yes, partition actions allow for offsets whereby one co-owner claims excess payments for mortgage, taxes, insurance, improvements, repairs and other property expenses

Speak to Our Napa County Partition Attorneys Today

Call our Napa County Partition Attorneys today to end your co-ownership dispute. You don’t pay until the house is sold!

Call us at (707) 777-6600 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation

    East Shore Co. v. Richmond Belt Ry. – Partition Action Case Study

    In the legal case of East Shore Co. v. Richmond Belt Ry., 172 Cal. 174 (1916), the issue was whether a partition of a parcel of land was valid. The parcel of land was owned by two parties, East Shore Co. and Richmond Belt Ry. East Shore Co. had attempted to partition the parcel of land, but Richmond Belt Ry. argued that the partition was invalid because it was not done in accordance with the law. The court ultimately held that the partition was valid, but that the parties must agree to the terms of the partition in order for it to be legally binding. This case is important because it established the legal precedent that a partition of land must be done in accordance with the law in order to be valid.

    Contact our Team of Experienced Partition Lawyers Serving Napa County, California

    Our Napa County partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. Talkov law unlocks access to justice for co-owners by funding your case. For qualified cases, you pay no fees until we successfully partition your property by obtaining a sale on the market or to your co-owner! For a free consultation with California’s first and largest team of partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (707) 777-6600 or contact us online today.

    Talkov Law is Rated 5 out of 5 stars based on 38 customer reviews.

    Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation & Pay No Retainer

    Call Talkov Law to discuss having your legal fees paid from the proceeds of sale of your property and no money down

        Awards and Recognition

        US News and World Report Scott Talkov

        We Have Been Featured On:

        The Real Deal

        The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.