WEBSITE VISITOR IP NOTIFICATIONS

Merced County Partition Lawyer

Partition Actions in Merced County

Merced County is located in the Central Valley of California, east of San Francisco. It is the 18th most populous county in the state, with a population of approximately 255,793. The county seat is Merced, and the largest city is Atwater. Merced County is home to the University of California, Merced, and is known for its agricultural production, including almonds, walnuts, tomatoes, and cotton. The county is also home to several state parks, including Merced River National Wildlife Refuge, San Luis National Wildlife Refuge, and Merced National Wildlife Refuge.

According to Zillow, the median home value in Merced County, California is $269,000 as of 2021. As of July 1, 2019, the population of Merced County, California was estimated to be 255,793.

Experienced Real Estate Partition Action Attorneys Serving Merced County

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Merced County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. California partition actions provide a legal mechanism for co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes allow a co-owner to file a lawsuit in court to have the property divided, either physically or by sale. The court will then order the division of the property in a way that is fair and equitable to all parties. The partition statutes also provide that any proceeds from the sale of the property must be divided among the co-owners in proportion to their respective interests in the property.

Our team of partition attorneys can assist co-owners with frequently asked questions about partitions, such as:

  • In a partition action, can I be reimbursed for paying more than my fair share of the down payment? Yes, partition actions allow for offsets whereby one co-owner claims excess payments for mortgage, taxes, insurance, improvements, repairs and other property expenses
  • How long will it take to get the property partitioned and sold? Most commonly, 3 to 6 months is all that it takes for the defendant to agree to a sale or buyout the plaintiff’s interest in the property for a fair value. Some cases may take 6 to 12 months.
  • Are there methods to resolve a partition situation without a court-ordered sale? The vast majority of partitions are solved without a court-ordered sale. Many times, the defendant will buy out the plaintiff’s interest. Other times, the parties will agree to a voluntary sale on the open market. However, the filing of the partition action is generally what forces the defendant to see the wisdom of settlement. Under California’s Partition of Real Property Act, a defendant can buy out the interest of the plaintiff at an appraised value, meaning that a court-ordered sale is only likely occur where the defendant simply can’t afford to buy the property but still won’t agree to sell.
  • Who pays for a partition action? In California, each party typically pays for their own attorney’s fees (known as the “American Rule”). However, California partition law allows for an exception to this rule, stating that “the court shall apportion the costs of partition among the parties in proportion to their interests or make such other apportionment as may be equitable.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.040. Indeed, the court may award “reasonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.010(a).
  • How will the court in a California partition action determine how much each co-owner will receive from the sales proceeds? Generally, each co-owner will receive their fractional interest in the proceeds of sale based on their ownership interests. However, this amount can be enhanced or diminished by partition offsets whereby one co-owner paid more than their fractional interest for property expenses.

Speak to Our Merced County Partition Attorneys Today

Call our Merced County Partition Attorneys today to end your co-ownership dispute. You don’t pay until the house is sold!

Call us at (209) 600-7700 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation

    Buckley v. Superior Court of San Francisco County – Partition Action Case Study

    In the legal case of Buckley v. Superior Court of San Francisco County, 102 Cal. 6 (1894), the issue of partition was at the center of the dispute. The case involved a dispute between two brothers, John and William Buckley, over the partition of a piece of real estate that had been inherited from their father. The brothers had agreed to divide the property, but William refused to accept the partition as proposed by John. The court was asked to determine whether the partition should be enforced. The court held that the partition should be enforced, but that the partition should be made in accordance with the wishes of both parties. The court also held that the partition should be made in such a way that each party would receive an equal share of the property. The court also held that the partition should be made in such a way that each party would receive an equal share of the profits from the property.

    Contact our Team of Experienced Partition Lawyers Serving Merced County, California

    Our Merced County partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. Talkov law unlocks access to justice for co-owners by funding your case. For qualified cases, you pay no fees until we successfully partition your property by obtaining a sale on the market or to your co-owner! For a free consultation with California’s first and largest team of partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (209) 600-7700 or contact us online today.

    Talkov Law is Rated 5 out of 5 stars based on 50 customer reviews.

    Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation & Pay No Retainer

    Call Talkov Law to discuss having your legal fees paid from the proceeds of sale of your property and no money down

      Awards and Recognition

      US News and World Report Scott Talkov

      We Have Been Featured On:

      The Real Deal

      The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.