Dublin Partition Lawyer

Partition Actions in Dublin

Dublin is a city located in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area in Alameda County, California. It is located about 35 miles east of San Francisco and is part of the Tri-Valley area. Dublin is a rapidly growing city and is known for its excellent schools, parks, and recreational activities. The city is home to a variety of businesses, including technology companies, medical centers, and retail stores. Dublin is also home to the Dublin Unified School District, which serves the city’s students. The city is also home to a variety of cultural attractions, including the Dublin Heritage Center, the Dublin Library, and the Dublin Civic Center.

According to Zillow, the median home value in Dublin, California is $845,400 as of 2021. As of the 2020 census, the population of the California area of Dublin, California is 8,919.

Experienced Real Estate Partition Action Attorneys Serving Dublin

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Alameda County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. California partition actions allows for the division of real property among co-owners. This statute provides a legal mechanism for co-owners to divide their real property into separate interests. The partition statutes allow for the court to order a partition of the property, either by physically dividing the property or by selling the property and dividing the proceeds among the co-owners. The partition statutes also provide for the court to award damages to any co-owner who has been wrongfully excluded from the property. The partition statutes also allows for the court to award attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party.

Our team of partition attorneys can assist co-owners with frequently asked questions about partitions, such as:

Speak to Our Dublin Partition Attorneys Today

Call our Alameda County Partition Attorneys today to end your co-ownership dispute. You don’t pay until the house is sold!

Call us at (925) 999-7700 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation

    Luckhardt v. Mooradian – Partition Action Case Study

    In the legal case of Luckhardt v. Mooradian, 92 Cal.App.2d 501 (1949), the issue of partition was at the center of the dispute. The case involved a dispute between two co-owners of a parcel of real property. The plaintiff, Luckhardt, sought to partition the property, while the defendant, Mooradian, argued that partition was not appropriate. The court ultimately held that partition was not appropriate in this case, as the parties had agreed to a joint tenancy, and partition would have destroyed the joint tenancy. The court also noted that partition would have been inequitable, as the parties had agreed to a joint tenancy in order to avoid the costs and delays associated with partition. The court also noted that partition would have been impractical, as the property was not easily divisible.

    Contact our Team of Experienced Partition Lawyers Serving the City of Dublin in the County of Alameda, California.

    Our partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. Call the experienced real estate partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (925) 999-7700 or contact us online for a free consultation about your co-ownership issues.

    Our partition attorneys in Dublin also serve San Ramon, Pleasanton, Livermore, Danville, and Castro Valley.

    Talkov Law is Rated 5 out of 5 stars based on 53 customer reviews.

    Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation & Pay No Retainer

    Call Talkov Law to discuss having your legal fees paid from the proceeds of sale of your property and no money down

      Awards and Recognition

      US News and World Report Scott Talkov

      We Have Been Featured On:

      The Real Deal

      Recent Blog Posts

      The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.