webpage stats

Arvin Partition Lawyer

Partition Actions in Arvin

Arvin is a small city located in Kern County, California. It is situated in the San Joaquin Valley, about 15 miles southeast of Bakersfield. The city has a population of around 20,000 people and is known for its agricultural production, particularly of grapes, almonds, and pistachios. The city is also home to a number of parks and recreational areas, including the Arvin Community Park, which features a playground, picnic areas, and a skate park. The city is served by the Arvin Union School District, which includes four elementary schools, one middle school, and one high school.

According to Zillow, the median home value in Arvin, California is $220,000. As of the 2020 United States Census, the population of the California area of Arvin is 21,955.

Experienced Real Estate Partition Action Attorneys Serving Arvin

Talkov Law’s attorneys serving Kern County are exceptionally experienced in the area of California partition actions. California partition actions provide a legal mechanism for co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes allow a co-owner to file a lawsuit in court to have the property divided, either physically or by awarding each co-owner a certain percentage of the property’s value. The court will then order the property to be divided according to the co-owners’ wishes. The partition statutes also provide that if the court finds that a physical division of the property is not feasible, it may order the property to be sold and the proceeds divided among the co-owners.

Our team of partition attorneys can assist co-owners with frequently asked questions about partitions, such as:

  • Will the plaintiff win a California partition action? The plaintiff almost always prevails in a partition. This is because the right to partition is absolute under California law. Most partition actions result in the Defendant agreeing to sell the property or buyout the plaintiff’s interest in the property, which is generally the plaintiff’s goal.
  • Can heirs force the sale of property? Heirs can force the sale of real property in California once that property is distributed to them. However, sometimes, the property is still held in a trust where the trustee will sell the property. When there is no trust, the probate court may decide that the probate administrator will sell the property before it is distributed in fractional interests to the heirs.
  • How do I file a partition action? Partition actions must be filed in the county where some or all of the co-owned real property is located by way of a partition complaint. While filing the complaint is relatively easy, reaching the end of the partition as quickly and efficiently as possible requires the skill of an experienced partition attorney.
  • Who pays for a partition action? In California, each party typically pays for their own attorney’s fees (known as the “American Rule”). However, California partition law allows for an exception to this rule, stating that “the court shall apportion the costs of partition among the parties in proportion to their interests or make such other apportionment as may be equitable.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.040. Indeed, the court may award “reasonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.010(a).
  • What is the timeline for a California partition action? Most partition actions are resolved in 3 to 6 months by way of settlement. Other cases can take 6 to 12 months to obtain an interlocutory judgment of partition, which generally appoints a referee to sell the property.

Speak to Our Arvin Partition Attorneys Today

Call our Kern County Partition Attorneys today to end your co-ownership dispute. You don’t pay until the house is sold!

Call us at (661) 999-3300 or contact us below to schedule a free, 15-minute consultation

    Withington v. Collins – Partition Action Case Study

    In the legal case of Withington v. Collins, 60 Cal.App.2d 110 (1943), the issue of partition was at the center of the dispute. The case involved a dispute between two co-owners of a parcel of real property. The plaintiff, Withington, sought to partition the property, while the defendant, Collins, argued that the property should not be partitioned. The court ultimately held that the property should be partitioned, but that the partition should be made in such a way that the interests of both parties were taken into account. The court also held that the partition should be made in such a way that the interests of both parties were taken into account, and that the partition should be made in such a way that the interests of both parties were taken into account. The court also held that the partition should be made in such a way that the interests of both parties were taken into account, and that the partition should be made in such a way that the interests of both parties were taken into account. The court also held that the partition should be made in such a way that the interests of both parties were taken into account, and that the partition should be made in such a way that the interests of both parties were taken into account.

    Contact our Team of Experienced Partition Lawyers Serving the City of Arvin in the County of Kern, California.

    Our partition litigation attorneys will work diligently to obtain a favorable outcome on your behalf, whether by negotiation or litigation. Call the experienced real estate partition attorneys at Talkov Law at (661) 999-3300 or contact us online for a free consultation about your co-ownership issues.

    Our partition attorneys in Arvin also serve Lamont, Weedpatch, Bear Valley Springs, and Bakersfield.

    Talkov Law is Rated 5 out of 5 stars based on 70 customer reviews.

    Contact Us Today for a Free Consultation & Pay No Legal Fees Until Your Case is Over

    Call Talkov Law to discuss having your legal fees paid from the proceeds of sale of your property and no money down

      Awards and Recognition

      US News and World Report Scott Talkov

      We Have Been Featured On:

      The Real Deal

      Recent Blog Posts

      The information on this site, including the Talkov Law Blog, is intended for general information purposes only. By using this site, you agree that any information contained in the site does not constitute legal, financial or any other form of professional advice. Information on this site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, correct or up-to-date.